I certainly have my own must have artists for future issues of comixpedia, but who would you like to see?
Somebody asked in another thread why the panels weren't randomized such that we got an equal number of responses, but I figured I'd start a new thread on the subject in case people had any helpful suggestions re. the way this was done.
Regarding randomization... my randomization method was to randomly assign the seven panels, BUT to ensure that all panels were assigned equally at the same time. So the very first e-mail I received had a random 1/7 panel, the second e-mail a 1/6 randomization, and so on down to the seventh, where they were guaranteed a certain panel to make sure everything was even... but the randomness of receiving the e-mail at that particular time compensated for that, as well as the fact that the preceding six had been decided randomly so, by extension, the seventh was in fact random as well.
I then repeated the same cycle over and over.
Which is a long-winded way of saying that all panels were +/- 1 evenly distributed (we didn't have a multiple-of-seven number of participants)... BUT since we had a 33% flake-out rate, not all panels received FINISHED entries. Rosenberg's, inexplicably, had one, for instance, Bill Duncan's had two, Shaenon and Roger and Roy had quite a lot.
I can't account for anything except randomness regarding how people completed certain starter panels. Fame obviously wasn't a factor, because Jon is arguably the "biggest" of the starter panel contributors. Openness of the starter panel wasn't a factor, because Roy's was 100% open to interpretation, while Roger's was very, very directed. Artistic merit didn't really enter into it, as all starter panels were meticulously rendered and there was no completion bias on the basis of style, colour/B&W or computer/hand-drawn panels.
In the future, I think I might restrict the number of opening panels for this sort of thing more, or just skip this particular concept -- not through any particular dislike for it, but in favour of trying new things. Believe me, there is no shortage of event ideas on this end.
ANNNNNNNNNND that's a wrap! Sort of. I still need to collect mailing addresses and so on and so forth.
Thanks to all who participated -- it was a blast! I hope tihs has breathed new life and direction into the FN concept and we can just head upward and onward from here on out!
- Matt